THORby CI
Technology · Compare

Which mill is right for your material?

Five mechanisms, five fineness ranges, five trade-offs. This table pulls the numbers straight from each platform's technology page so you can shortlist before reading the full physics.

ModelMechanismTypical finenessTypical materialsKey trade-off
Hammer MillImpact + shear200 µm – 5 mmGrain, biomass, oresFine screens (<150 µm) blind on moist or greasy feeds
Pin MillUnrestrained impact50 – 300 µmSugar, lactose, spicesAbrasive feeds (Mohs >3.5) wear pins fast
Jet MillAutogenous collisiond90 < 5 µmAPIs, pigments, cosmeticsNeeds a steady supply of oil-free compressed air
Ball MillTumbling media20 – 200 µmIron ore, silica, cement clinkerHeavy drum and media demand reinforced foundations
Air ClassifierAerodynamic separation2 – 150 µm (cut point)Cement, talc, recycled plasticsSeparates only — needs a pre-milled feed

Fineness ranges and trade-offs are typical figures drawn from each platform's technology page — consult the linked article for the full physics and specification range.

01 / How to choose

Match the mechanism to the material

Hammer and pin mills lead on throughput for coarse-to-medium feed, but both hit a physical ceiling: hammer mills lose efficiency below roughly 40 microns d90, and abrasive minerals wear pins fast. Ball mills bring the same tumbling-media reliability to hard, dense ores and cement clinker, at the cost of a reinforced foundation. Jet mills go furthest into sub-micron territory with zero grinding-media contamination, but need compressed-air infrastructure to run. Air classifiers don't grind at all — they sharpen the cut on a pre-milled feed, which is why they're most often paired with one of the other four in a closed loop.

If your target fineness sits below 40–50 microns, start with the Jet Mill or an Air Classifier loop. Above that, the Hammer Mill, Pin Mill or Ball Mill will usually be the simpler mechanical choice, without the compressed-air or classifier-loop infrastructure the finer platforms need.